Case Processing
Hydrajaws: Reliable Solutions for Pull Testing and Safety Inspections
Hydrajaws is a recognized name in the field of pull testing equipment, providing solutions for assessing the strength and reliability of anchors, fixings, and structural connections. Such equipment is important in construction, engineering, and maintenance projects where safety and compliance with technical requirements are essential.
Pull testing helps determine whether an installed anchor can withstand specific loads before being used in demanding applications. Hydrajaws testing systems are designed to support accurate measurements and provide useful information about the performance of different fixing types. Their equipment can be used on construction sites, industrial facilities, and other locations where reliable testing is required.
Choosing appropriate testing equipment involves considering load capacity, accuracy, portability, and compatibility with different anchor systems. Regular inspections and correct testing procedures also contribute to dependable results.
I-360 SIJ AND G-325 A( for deferred action)
SIJ DEFERRED ACTION — IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THOSE STILL WAITING
For everyone who had their Form I-360 (SIJ) approved during the stay in A.C.R. v. Noem but has not received deferred action, I strongly recommend taking steps to determine whether USCIS actually conducted a deferred action consideration at the time your petition was approved.
Here is what I recommend doing:
1. Submit a Case Inquiry
Submit an inquiry regarding your approved Form I-360, specifically asking whether deferred action consideration was conducted under the court-ordered stay in A.C.R. v. Noem.
2. Contact USCIS and Request a Tier 2 Officer
You can also contact USCIS directly and ask whether your approved I-360 included a deferred action consideration.
If the initial representative cannot provide that information, request that your inquiry be escalated to a Tier 2 Immigration Services Officer for further review.
3. Submit a FOIA Request
Request your I-360 case records, including the case history, adjudication notes, and any available documentation showing whether deferred action consideration occurred.
I recommend pursuing all three options, especially because obtaining written evidence could be extremely important.
WHY DOES THIS MATTER?
There is an important legal distinction between being considered for deferred action and actually being granted deferred action.
If you obtain USCIS records confirming that deferred action consideration was not conducted when it was required under the applicable court order and policy, you may have grounds to argue that USCIS made an administrative error.
However, the absence of a deferred action decision in your approval notice or FOIA records does not automatically prove that USCIS failed to conduct the required consideration.
4. Consider Requesting Expedited Processing Based on USCIS Error
If you obtain credible evidence of a USCIS error, you may consider submitting an expedite request based on that error.
IMPORTANT: Evidence of an administrative error alone does not guarantee approval of an expedite request. You should also provide documentation explaining why correcting the error is urgent and why your circumstances warrant expedited action.
Evidence you should consider submitting:
* A signed personal statement explaining the alleged USCIS error, its consequences, and the urgency of correcting it.
* The relevant court order staying the policy change in A.C.R. v. Noem, Case No. 1:25-cv-03962.
* USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0198, together with an explanation of its relevance to your case.
* Any USCIS correspondence, FOIA records, or other documentation supporting your claim that the required deferred action consideration was not conducted.
* Supporting evidence of financial hardship, humanitarian circumstances, or other time-sensitive consequences, if applicable.
5. Consider a Federal Mandamus Lawsuit if USCIS Continues to Delay
If USCIS continues to delay taking action despite your efforts, you may want to consult an immigration attorney about filing a writ of mandamus or an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) lawsuit in the appropriate U.S. District Court.
A mandamus lawsuit does not guarantee that USCIS will approve your deferred action request.
Instead, depending on the circumstances, a federal court may order USCIS to perform a legally required duty or take action on an unreasonably delayed matter. The court does not necessarily have authority to require USCIS to grant deferred action.
MY FINAL ADVICE
Document everything. Keep copies of your inquiries, FOIA responses, USCIS communications, and supporting evidence.
The goal is to establish whether USCIS complied with the legal requirements applicable when your I-360 was approved and, if not, to obtain evidence supporting a request for corrective action.
Do not assume that USCIS properly considered deferred action simply because your I-360 was approved. Ask questions, request your records, and document the answers.
Disclaimer: This is general information based on my research and experience, not legal advice. Eligibility and available remedies depend on each person’s circumstances, the applicable court orders, and current USCIS policy.
divorce waiver pending 751
hello everyone just wanted to see if there’s anyone here has the same situation as mine. my i-751 originally filed as joint and august this year i got my final divorce decree. my lawyer adviced me to submit a letter to convert my petition from joint to divorce waiver together with proof of bonafide marriage which I prepared and uploaded everything to my uscis online account. my question is am i supposed to receive like an acceptance letter or update from them that they got my documents? another question is that i am planning to go out of the country this january and also march and I still have my extension letter from the original joint petition for i-751. will that serve as my extension letter for divorce waiver or uscis will provide me with a new one? usually how long does it take for them to mail it?
I’m tearing up
25 months since we filed, 17 months since the interview, finally my case got approved. I’m still emotional right now.
Wish everyone a lot of luck and have faith, your time will come soon ❤️
IR-1/CR-1
U.S. citizen filing for a spouse
Total Days: 755 days
Case
2024-10-16
2026-11-10
I-130
755 Days
I-485
750 Days
Nebraska Service Center: I-130, I-485
N400 stuck - no interview scheduled
frustrating it’s been more than 16 months now , no update on my case , super annoying, anyone from Sacramento with same timeline here 😔
Naturalization
Application for Naturalization
Total Days: 2175 days
Case
2020-12-01
Today
I-485
666 Days
N-400
502 Days
National Benefits Center: I-485, N-400
I had my combo interview on oct9th Orlando FO
everything went fine passed my test and officer said it’s all good I just need to redo my biometric
photo and then it will be approved but my status still interview scheduled!! after the interview my 1751 got approved right away and received my card and by a 10 days exactly on Oct 27 I did my biometrics and since then nothing on the citizenship application!!! idk what’s going on any similar experience thank you all
is Interview coming???? After Congressional inquiry I got this message today.
“We have confirmed that your constituent's case remains pending at San Francisco Field Office and will be scheduled for an adjustment of status interview when an interview slot becomes available. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will contact your constituent directly when an interview is scheduled or if additional information is requested prior to the interview.
We respectfully request you allow at least 90 days from the date of this email before following up on the status of the case.”
#interview ?
Is this one of the generic answers or real interview coming?
Have you ever heard these kind of updates?
please share your thoughts!
(Local FO)