Comunidad

f
filler 2022
2h
New update Aug 5!! hope this helps
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is clarifying that benefit requestors should establish eligibility for an immigration benefit at the time they file a benefit request. Generally, if a benefit requestor fails to demonstrate eligibility for a benefit or fails to provide all required initial evidence when filing an application, USCIS may deny their immigration benefit request without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). USCIS form instructions specify all required initial evidence for every benefit request, giving requestors all the information needed to comply. This policy better aligns USCIS procedures with long-standing Department of Homeland Security regulatory authority and form instructions, helps restore integrity to the immigration system, and makes it more difficult for aliens to file frivolous benefit requests. This policy update amends the previous Biden-era policy, which encouraged officers to request evidence before denying a benefit request, even if the benefit requestor filed an incomplete application, failed to demonstrate eligibility for the benefit, or failed to provide the initial evidence that was clearly required at the time of filing. This prior policy allowed frivolous or substantially incomplete filings to slow USCIS processing for others waiting in line. The Biden policy also enabled benefit requestors to exploit the system by filing “placeholder” applications to gain associated immigration benefits, like employment authorization, while they waited for a decision on their case. USCIS has restored officers’ full discretion to deny a benefit request without first issuing an RFE or NOID in various situations. With this updated policy, USCIS can better allocate resources to efficiently make decisions and prevent meritless requests. The policy is effective immediately and applies to requests pending or filed on or after Aug. 5, 2026, unless otherwise specified by regulations or USCIS policy.
Comentarios
Cleef Tara cadet
7h
Can USCIS approve my I-485 with I-220A and expedited removal history?
My family-based I-485 has been pending since July 2022 and is based on an approved I-130 filed by my U.S.-citizen stepfather. I completed updated biometrics, and my green card interview is scheduled soon. I entered the United States in 2021 and was released on Form I-220A. USCIS later stated that DHS records show I was placed in expedited removal and issued Form I-860. I have never appeared before an immigration judge, and the EOIR system shows no court case under my A-number. Has anyone had a family-based I-485 approved with a similar I-220A and expedited-removal history? Did USCIS require Form I-212, another waiver, or additional evidence at the interview? I am consulting an immigration attorney, but I would appreciate hearing from people with similar experiences.

F3

U.S. citizen filing for a married son or daughter over 21

Días totales: 1468 días
Case
2022-07-29
Today
I-485
1468 días
National Benefits Center: I-485
Comentarios
a
ahmetcan kaya
9h
FAMILY
Court / Judge: EOIR Virginia / Deepali Nadkarni (Denial Rate: 7.8%, Other Rate: 81%) Goal: Since the children are currently in Turkey, we do not want administrative closure (Other); we are aiming for a direct GRANTED (Asylum Approval) to proceed with Form I-730 Asylee Relative Petition. Evidence: U.S. Department of State and U.S. Army certified official documents, a signed attestation letter from a former U.S. Consul, and the potential for their live testimony via teleconference. QUESTION: Even though the judge's "Other" rate is 81%, given the official U.S. government certifications, diplomatic testimony, and the necessity of bringing the children from Turkey, what are our chances of rejecting the prosecutor's offer for administrative closure and securing a direct GRANTED decision in the first hearing? What strategy should the attorney follow during the hearing?
Comentarios
Anterior
12345
Siguiente
© 2026 Lawfully Inc.
Política de privacidad|Términos de servicio|Política de privacidad (Lawfully Pro)|Términos de servicio (Lawfully Pro)|Acuerdo de representación de alcance limitado