Sorry to hear about the denial. That's a rough one after putting a case together. A few things worth checking before you refile. Read the denial notice closely first. Which Dhanasar prong did they actually fail you on? Refiling without knowing that risks repeating the same loss. Prong 1 (national importance) means the endeavor framing needs rebuilding entirely. Prong 2 is usually fixable with better evidence. Prong 3 is the hardest and the one most people miss. My guess at the likely issue: "aviation safety and training expertise" reads as a description of your job, not a proposed endeavor. 17,000 hours and B737 command establish you're an excellent pilot, but USCIS reads flying routes as employment, not as an endeavor with national benefit. You'd need something specific and articulable: a safety systems methodology, a training programme, a particular certification approach. Something with reach beyond one flight deck. Prong 3 is where pilot cases usually die. There's a visible, functioning labour market for airline captains with established sponsorship routes. An adjudicator will ask why the job offer requirement should be waived when airlines hire pilots through normal channels every day. You need a concrete reason your work can't be tied to a single employer. That argument is harder for pilots than for most professions, and it needs to be the strongest part of your petition, not an afterthought. Exceptional ability without a degree isn't your problem. You need three of six criteria and you almost certainly have ten years' full time experience, professional licence (ATPL plus examiner and instructor authorisations), and salary evidence. That part should be straightforward. One warning. Don't refile the same petition with more recommendation letters bolted on. The adjudicator can see the prior denial. A refiling that doesn't visibly address the stated grounds looks weaker than the original. On finding a lawyer, rather than hunting for someone who's done aviation cases specifically, ask candidates directly how many NIW denials they've refiled successfully and what they changed. That's the experience that matters here, not the sector. Good luck with it.

Dear Henri, Thank you so much for taking the time to write such a detailed reply. I honestly really appreciate it. This is probably the clearest and most useful feedback I’ve received since the denial. Sorry for the slow reply. I’m currently on holiday in Vietnam with my family, so I haven’t been checking the app as often as usual. I think you are absolutely correct. The RFE specifically said that my proposed endeavor appeared to be more like an airline pilot looking for a job in the US. Looking back now, I can see that the focus was not in the right place. The petition spent a lot of time showing that I’m an experienced captain, instructor and examiner, but it didn’t clearly explain what I would actually be doing beyond normal employment as a pilot. It should probably have focused on a specific aviation safety or training initiative that could have a wider impact beyond one airline or one employer. Your point about not simply refiling the same petition with more recommendation letters is also very important. I definitely don’t want to spend more money just to submit the same case in a slightly different package. If I refile, I want the entire case and proposed endeavor to be properly rebuilt around the reasons for the denial. I would be happy to upload my denial notice if you would be interested in having a look at it. I would genuinely value your opinion, but I also completely understand that you have already taken a lot of time to respond. Can I also ask whether you have any experience with aviation-related NIW cases, or with successful refilings after a denial? And is there a particular lawyer or firm you would recommend for a case like mine? I’m trying to find someone who will be honest about the weaknesses and rebuild the strategy properly, rather than simply repackaging the old petition. Thanks again. I really appreciate your honesty and the effort you put into your reply.